Legal Opinion

Strauel v. Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1952No. 33067PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover *449•damages claimed to have resulted from the purchase of cattle infected with Bang’s disease. Issues were made and trial was had resulting in a judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning error in giving and failing to give instructions and in the admission of evidence. Defendant contends that plaintiffs have neither pleaded nor proved a cause of action and have no right of recovery, and that in any event the record is free of prejudicial error. We sustain the first of the above contentions and affirm the judgment of the trial court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanley v. Fireproof Building Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Campbell v. YoungsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Frontier Steam Laundry Co. v. ConnollyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Johnson v. WeborgNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Strahl v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Claypool v. HibberdNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Conner v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Davis v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Nelson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API