Legal Opinion
People v. Stanley
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1999No. B123700PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J. *
Jack Mace Stanley and David Singerman appeal from the judgment following guilty pleas to a charge of cultivating marijuana. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358.) Probation was granted on various terms and conditions including the service of 120 and 90 days in the county jail, respectively. Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence.
We conclude that a search warrant was not required to install a surveillance meter to monitor consumption of electricity at Stanley’s house. We also conclude that the affidavit in support of the search warrant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DomiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Nevins CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- State v. DomiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006