Legal Opinion

State v. Domicz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 20, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

907 A.2d 395 (2006)

188 N.J. 285

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Keith R. DOMICZ, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 21, 2006.

Decided September 20, 2006.

Paul H. Heinzel and Leslie-Ann M. Justus, Deputy Attorneys General, argued the cause for appellant (Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Heinzel, Ms. Justus, Deborah C. Bartolomey, Daniel I. Bornstein and Russell J. Curley, Deputy Attorneys General, on the briefs).

Alison S. Perrone, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Albin.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API