Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 2003No. A102208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Defendant Donald Wilson appeals from his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol causing bodily injury. Prior to his arrest, defendant consented to a preliminary alcohol screening test (PAS test) that measured the blood-alcohol level (BAL) in the breath sample he provided at 0.09 percent. After his arrest, he was required to submit to a blood test, which measured his BAL at 0.12 percent. He contends that the blood test constituted an unreasonable search and seizure and that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of the test. We affirm.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. BuryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. ROZE v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. The People v. Superior Court CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API