Legal Opinion

Wolcott v. Judge of Superior Court

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Mandamus by Alfred Wolcott, prosecuting attorney of Kent county, to compel Edwin A. Burlingame, judge of the superior court of Grand Rapids, to vacate an order quashing an information.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Relator filed an information in the superior court against one Fred Saunders, a resident of the city of Grand Rapids, charging that the respondent was engaged in the business of selling at retail spirituous liquors, etc., without first having made, executed, and delivered to the treasurer of the county the bond required by law; and that the failure to file such bond consisted in this: That the bond made and filed was not signed by two or more sureties who were not sureties upon two or more other similar bonds, but that the bond made, executed, *312and delivered by said Fred Saunders was signed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amperse v. WinslowMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Parker v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Kuhn v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Potter v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SnowbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. JewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WorgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bailey v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kirkpatrick v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API