Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whaley v. Belleque

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2008No. 06-35759Published

1DissentHall, Circuit Judge

I

Before seeking a federal writ of habeas corpus, a state prisoner must exhaust state remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1) by giving the state the opportunity “to pass upon and correct” the alleged federal constitutional violations. Baldwin v. Reese, 541 U.S. 27, 29, 124 S.Ct. 1347, 158 L.Ed.2d 64 (2004). “A petitioner has satisfied the exhaustion requirement if: (1) he has ‘fairly presented’ his federal claim to the highest state court with jurisdiction to consider it, or (2) he demonstrates that no state remedy remains available.” Johnson v. Zenon, 88 F.3d 828, 829 (9th Cir.1996) (citations…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API