Legal Opinion
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 1899No. 3802PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the Court of Appeals.
1Per curiam
The defendant in error, Roberts, commenced this action against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company before a justice of the peace to recover damages for killing a horse. It was taken on appeal to the county court, where there was a judgment for plaintiff. An appeal was taken by the company to the court of appeals, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Roberts, 10 Colo. App. 87. To review this judgment of the court of appeals, the company brings the ease here on error.
Numerous errors are assigned upon the rulings of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Fink v. Lancashire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Patrick v. CroweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitney v. ClevelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. BrennamanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. PeppardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917