Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Brennaman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1909No. 5474; No. 3144 C. APublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Costilla District Court—Hon. C. C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

Appellee brought this action to recover for injury to his horse, which he claims was struck by a locomotive of the appellant, in December, 1902. There are no pleadings, as the action was commenced before a justice of the peace, taken on appeal to the county court and from thence removed to the district court by stipulation of the parties. There is no evidence of negligence on the part of appellant, and, if it is at all liable, it is by reason of its failure to fence its right-of-way as provided in an act of the general assembly of this state, approved March *26514, 1902. The appellant, in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wall v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Gleason v. Judicial Watch, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API