Legal Opinion

People v. Hearon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1999No. C028314PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

Before summarizing the case and addressing the other claims of error, we seek to put out of its misery a contention routinely raised in criminal appeals filed in this district, and apparently in every other district of the Court of Appeal.

In a well-worn argument that has become the soup du jour of appellate . advocacy in criminal cases, defendant Jimmy Ray Hearon claims the definition of reasonable doubt given to the jury in accordance with Penal Code section 1096 (Stats. 1995, ch. 46, § 1) and CALJIC No. 2.90 is “defective in that it gave the jury no guidance as to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. HurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WhisenhuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. ZepedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Schmier v. Supreme CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API