People v. Hearon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
Before summarizing the case and addressing the other claims of error, we seek to put out of its misery a contention routinely raised in criminal appeals filed in this district, and apparently in every other district of the Court of Appeal.
In a well-worn argument that has become the soup du jour of appellate . advocacy in criminal cases, defendant Jimmy Ray Hearon claims the definition of reasonable doubt given to the jury in accordance with Penal Code section 1096 (Stats. 1995, ch. 46, § 1) and CALJIC No. 2.90 is “defective in that it gave the jury no guidance as to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. HurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WhisenhuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Daveggio & MichaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. ZepedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Schmier v. Supreme CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.