People v. Aguilar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, J.
Joel Ruelas Aguilar appeals his conviction for the crime of torture (Pen. Code, § 206). He challenges the constitutionality of section 206 on the grounds of vagueness and contends the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury that the crime of torture under section 206 requires the willful, deliberate, and premeditated intent to inflict prolonged pain. We join the Third and Fifth Appellate Districts in rejecting both arguments.
Appellant also argues the trial court’s instruction defining “reasonable doubt” lessened the prosecution’s burden of proof, thereby…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. RaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. PreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Smith, Jr.California Supreme Court · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.