Legal Opinion

Beaty v. Minnesota Board of Teaching

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1984No. CX-83-1929PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the Minnesota Board of Teaching denying appellant’s application for licensure as a School Psychologist I. Appellant claims (1) the Board’s failure to apply equitable es-toppel was an error of law, (2) the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, and (3) the Board’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant has been employed for the past thirteen years as a counselor at the Marshall Middle School in Marshall, Minnesota. She has 20 years of experience in education and is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Beste v. Independent School District No. 697Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Neujahr v. Ramsey County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API