Legal Opinion
Brinks, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1984No. C3-84-423PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Brinks, Inc. (Brinks) appeals from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission’s) final order granting Rochester Armored Car Company’s application for irregular route common carrier authority and from the Commission’s order denying Brinks’ petition for reconsideration. Brinks claims that the Commission did not have jurisdiction to decide this matter, that the Commission’s decision to grant Rochester Armored Car’s petition was not supported by substantial evidence, and that the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously by not giving proper deference to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Beaty v. Minnesota Board of TeachingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hymanson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harford v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Info Tel Communications, LLC v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Department of Human Services v. Muriel Humphrey ResidencesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Claim of City of Mankato v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.