Legal Opinion

People v. Smith-Anthony

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2012No. Docket No. 300480PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.

Defendant, Chandra Valencia Smith-Anthony, placed a $58 box of fragrance in a shopping bag and left the Macy’s department store in Northland Mall without paying for it. After completing her larceny *415and leaving the store, defendant engaged in a scuffle with a store security officer. A jury acquitted defendant of unarmed robbery but convicted her of larceny from the person in violation of MCL 750.357. Because the statute punishes “stealing from the person of another” and defendant’s conduct does not fall within that definition, we reverse.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

While monitoring a closed-circuit…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. TennysonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Smith-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kubicki v. SharpeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Duryane Chaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Harrison v. Munson Healthcare, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People of Michigan v. Kathleen Louise WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API