Legal Opinion

Samuel Brilliant Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 4, 1985No. Court No. 81-4-00458Published

1Opinion of the Court

Restani, Judge:

Plaintiff brought this action to contest the United States Customs Service’s ("Customs”) appraisement of imported footwear. The footwear was exported from China in January 1978 and entered at Boston in April 1978. Upon entry, the imported footwear was appraised on the basis of American Selling Price ("ASP”) using UniRoyal’s Champion Slip-on and Booster Oxford as domestic prototypes.

*181ASP is a valuation methodology1 that pertains to classifications of particular goods including certain footwear. Academy Broadway Corp. v. United States, 9 CIT 55, Slip Op. 85-16 at 3 (February 5,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Japan Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API