Legal Opinion

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1972No. R.D. 11773; Entry Nos. 961416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The above-captioned case having been remanded from, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and plaintiff having moved for an Order dismissing the case, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact

1. The merchandise involved herein consists of so-called tennis oxfords, having uppers wholly or in chief value of cotton and soles wholly or in chief value of rubber, exported from Japan in 1959.

2. The imported merchandise was of the class or kind described in Presidential Proclamation No. 2027, dated February 1,1933, 63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Samuel Brilliant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  2. Samuel Brilliant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Samuel Brilliant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API