Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 15, 2004No. 07-02-0515-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Terry Anthony Wilson (appellant) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Through two issues, he contends 1) that his original appellate counsel was ineffective because he filed a defective notice of appeal and 2) the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm the judgment.

Issue One — Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

Appellant initially argues that his first counsel was ineffective because he failed to properly perfect the appeal. Furthermore, the default was exemplified by counsel’s filing of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  2. Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  3. Tucker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  5. Bobby Richard White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API