Tucker v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Tommy Lee Tucker (appellant) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Via a single issue, appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress. Appellant contended below and here that the officer who stopped him for a traffic violation lacked justification to frisk the outside of a fanny pack he wore at the time. For the following reasons, we agree and reverse.
Standard of Review
The standard of review applicable is one of abused discretion, as described in Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 89…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniel Lee Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Gary Westbrook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- John Smithwick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Kenric Leal Marshall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Timothy Scott Lawson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007