State v. King

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1 (93) N.M. S.A. 1953 (Supp.1969)] was denied without a hearing and he appeals.

We affirm.

Defendant asserts that he was not advised of his right to remain silent; that he was at no time afforded counsel; that he signed a statement without assistance of counsel; and that the district attorney’s office advised him as to what to do when he entered his plea.

These assertions are not sustained by the record. The record shows that he was offered counsel if he could not afford to hire his own lawyer, that he told…