Stafford v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINTON.....
'HENDLEY, Judge.-
Defendant originally pleaded guilty to a charge of sexual assault. Thereafter! he ' filed a pro se “Writ of Habeas Corpus” which was treated as a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to § 21 — 1—1 (93) N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4). The inotión was denied without hearing and defendant appeals giving three grounds for reversal.
We affirm. ’ '
1. DEFENDANT’S HEALTH CON- - DITION.
Defendant contends that “Due to * * * my health conditions I do not feel like I received Justice.” Appellate’s counsel contends that because defendant lacked verbal eloquence, “the- obvious…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. LeybaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. GuyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Hoffman v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. JiminezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. RamosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. BiusNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. McClarronNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.