Legal Opinion

Adkins v. State

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1971No. 575Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A. 1953, (Repl.Vol. 4, 1970)] was denied after a hearing on the motion. Defendant asserts the trial court erred in finding that at the original trial he (1) was adequately advised of his rights, (2) was adequately represented by counsel, (3) knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, and (4) voluntarily entered his guilty plea.

We affirm.

On appeal we view the evidence most favorable to support the findings. State v. Moser, 80 N.M. 404, 456 P.2d 878 (1969). Findings supported by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HansenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. State v. MoserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State v. WheelerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API