Legal Opinion

United States v. Cotton

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 28, 1983No. 83-CR-17PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

The post-sentencing motion now pending in this case presents the troublesome ques tion of whether the Court retains jurisdiction under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to reduce a sentence more than 120 days after the sentence has become final. While the Court is inclined to agree with the recent dictum of the Court of Appeals for this Circuit that in cases such as this, the sentencing judge is without jurisdiction to reduce the defendant’s sentence, the Court denies the present motion on the broader ground that defendant has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Robert L. Demier, Barbara Demier, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TorresIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Thomas D. Gaertner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. ParrishIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. GaertnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Thomas D. Gaertner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API