Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. McCarrell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Crown Pontiac, Inc., appeals from an order of the circuit court denying its motion to compel arbitration of the claims stated against it in an action filed by Andrew McCarrell. The issue is whether a preliminary document containing McCarrell's signature1 became a part of the later-executed contract, which was executed on the same form but on which McCarrell did not sign on the signature line below the arbitration clause.
McCarrell went to Crown Pontiac to look for a used sports car to purchase. Charles Locke, a salesman for Crown Pontiac, showed McCarrell a used 1990 model Nissan 300ZX. Locke…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- James G. Neal v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Ex Parte Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.