Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 17, 1993No. 1-92-1397PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Giannis

The City of Chicago (City) appeals from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) approving with modification Commonwealth Edison Company’s (Edison) proposed Rider 28 — "Local Government Compliance Clause” (Rider 28). In general, Rider 28 directs Edison to recover the marginal costs of providing "nonstandard” service from customers within any governmental unit that mandates such service. Currently any additional costs associated with mandated nonstandard service are recovered from all Edison consumers as a component of Edison’s base electricity rates. Rider 28 would, for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. SlatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Village of Apple River v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Produce Terminal Corp. v. Illinois Commerce Commission Ex Rel. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Monarch Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Pliura Intervenors v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Ameropan Oil Corp. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API