Legal Opinion

Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1996No. 1—95—0937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cousins

The petitioners, Business and Professional People for the Public Interest and Citizens Utility Board, appeal from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) which found that Commonwealth Edison (Edison) had established the prudence of its cost of fuel for inclusion in Edison’s rate base as required under section 9 — 220 of the Public Utilities Act (Act) (220 ILCS 5/9 — 220 (West 1992)). In the Commission proceedings, petitioners contended that Edison should bear the costs of four unplanned temporary shutdowns at Edison’s nuclear plants that Edison’s employees had caused through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. United Cities Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Lakehead Pipeline Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Illinois Power Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Commonwealth Edison v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Illinois Power Company v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API