Pliura Intervenors v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann
In August 2007, respondent, Enbridge Pipelines (Illinois), L.L.C. (Enbridge Pipelines), filed an application for a certificate in good standing and other relief pursuant to section 15 — 401 of the Public Utilities Act (220 ILCS 5/15 — 401 (West 2008)). In July 2009, corespondent, the Illinois Commerce Commission, approved Enbridge Pipelines’ application, which (1) certified it as a “common carrier by pipeline” and (2) authorized the construction, operation, and maintenance of an oil pipeline.
Petitioners, Pliura Intervenors and Turner Intervenors (collectively, Intervenors), appeal, both…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Lakehead Pipeline Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Alhambra-Grantfork Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Keith Puntenney, Laverne I. Johnson, Richard R. Lamb, Marian D. Johnson, Northwest Iowa Landowners Association, Iowa Farmland Owners Association, Inc., and the Sierra Club Iowa Chapter v. Iowa Utilities Board, and Office of Consumer Advocate and The Main Coalition, and Dakota Access, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Apple Canyon Lake Property Owners' Ass'n v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Enbridge Energy, LLC v. KuerthAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.