Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1996No. 1-94-3781PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO

The Hlinois Commerce Commission (the Commission) determined that Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison) customers outside the City of Chicago (the City) are treated unfairly by Edison’s recovery of the franchise fee it pays to the City, through the general rates it charges all its customers. The Commission therefore ordered Edison to remove local franchise fees and other franchise costs from base rates for all its customers and to localize recovery of those costs by adding a separate line-item charge on the bills of customers who reside in the municipality charging the fee. Under the order,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Chicago v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Austin View Civic Ass'n v. City of Palos HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Lakehead Pipeline Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API