Wettengel v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
When this case was here before (Wettengel v. Robinson, 288 Pa. 362), we held that defendants, who had been directors of the Riverside Western Oil Company (a West Virginia corporation, which had surrendered its charter and whose stock had been delivered up for cancellation), were, in law, its statutory liquidators, bound to collect its assets and account for them in this State. This they did, were surcharged by the court below in the sums of $66,399.05 and $895 respectively, and, because thereof, have prosecuted the first of the present appeals. It was originally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- William Danzer & Co. v. Gulf & Ship Island RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Rupert v. Policemen's Relief & Pension FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Jinks v. George S. Hensel B. & L. Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1942
- Notary Public Act of 1953, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.