Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Policemen's Relief & Pension Fund

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1957No. Appeal, No. 185PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

This appeal raises the question whether an Act of the Legislature amending an earlier Act by changing the class of beneficiaries entitled to a pension fund after the death of the pension member, can be applied retroactively in favor of the designated beneficiaries under the amending Act.

*629The facts, which are stipulated, may be summarized as follows: The decedent, William C. Rupert, worked continuously as a patrolman in the police department of the City of Pittsburgh from the time of his appointment, June 12, 1923, until his death on October 10, 1955. Upon entering…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Sablosky v. MessnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Baker v. Retirement Bd. of Allegheny Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Krenzelak v. KrenzelakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Lynch v. Owen J. Roberts School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Dorsey v. State Ex Rel. MulrineSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API