Legal Opinion

People v. Lacewell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 2013PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated July 25, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires a court making a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) to “render an *785order setting forth its determinations and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GrubbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. DashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. FitzpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API