Legal Opinion

Combined Insurance v. Shurter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. S-98-1038PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Combined Insurance (Combined), the employer of Lois J. Shurter, appeals the decision of the district court for Adams County dismissing its petition for declaratory judgment filed against Shurter in which, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-118 (Reissue 1993), Combined sought $34,045 of the $75,000 settlement proceeds which Shurter had received from Southern Nebraska Rural Public Power District (Southern Nebraska Power), the alleged tort-feasor. Section 48-118 pertains to an employer’s subrogation rights under the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Act. We find that the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bohl v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lyle Stoneman v. United Nebraska BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Putnam v. FortenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Polinski v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Horace Mann Companies v. PinaireNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Burns v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jameson v. Liquid Controls Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Turney v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API