Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Fortenberry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1999No. S-97-1235PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

INTRODUCTION

Dorothy Putnam appeals from the district court’s denial of temporary and permanent injunctions against the appellees, Jeff Fortenberry; Cindy Johnson; Dale Young, Jerry Shoecraft; Colleen Seng; Curt Donaldson; Linda Wilson; City of Lincoln, Nebraska; and Michael Johanns (hereinafter collectively the City), enjoining the City from completing the sale of Lincoln General Hospital (hereinafter Lincoln General) from the City of Lincoln to Bryan Memorial Hospital and Bryan Healthcare, Inc. (hereinafter collectively Bryan). The threshold issue we must address is whether it is appropriate…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. NissenNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. SquierNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Boyles v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Central States Foundation v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nesbitt Ex Rel. Himself & All Other Similarly Situated Neb. State Penitentiary Segregated Prisoners v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Elstun v. ElstunNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API