Legal Opinion

State v. Smallwood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 856SC593PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Of the four assignments argued, three relate to whether the knife used was a dangerous weapon. We conclude that because the evidence supported, but did not compel, a finding that the knife used was a dangerous weapon and there was no instruction on common law robbery, defendant is entitled to a new trial.

I

One of the elements of armed robbery is that the accused used or threatened to use a firearm or other dangerous weapon. G.S. 14-87(a). In fact, the courts have characterized the use of a dangerous weapon as the main element of the offense. See State v. Beaty, 306 N.C. 491, 293…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. BeatySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. RoddeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Handy v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API