Legal Opinion

Minter v. Osborne Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1997No. COA96-1220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff-employee was stung by an insect while working for defendant-employer. After hospital treatment, plaintiff suffered obstructive coronary artery disease. The Industrial Commission held that the sting was an injury by accident and directed defendant insurer to pay all medical expenses, including angioplasty. We find no compensable injury, and we reverse.

The evidence presented at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner shows the following. On or about 30 August 1993, plaintiff David Minter began work as a carpenter for defendant construction company. On 8 December 1993,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Culpepper v. Fairfield Sapphire ValleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Dillingham v. Yeargin Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Guy v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Southwestern Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Kashino v. Carolina Vet. Spec. Med. Servs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Roman v. Southland Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Adams v. Becton Dickinson CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
  5. Kashino v. Carolina Vet. Specialists Medical Serv.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API