Kashino v. Carolina Vet. Specialists Medical Serv.
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Opinion of the Court
The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Glenn with minor modifications.
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Norris v. Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc./MascoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Futrell v. Resinall Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.