Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 30, 2001No. 06-01-00004-CRPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM J. CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

LaJuan Scott Freeman appeals his conviction for possession of more than five pounds but less than fifty pounds of marihuana. After the trial court denied Freeman’s motion to suppress, Freeman waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty. The trial court rejected the State’s recommendation of five years’ confinement and sentenced Freeman to eight years’ confinement.

Freeman contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress because the evidence found was the product of an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  3. Perales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. Maysonet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API