Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. 92305PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

The issue we consider is whether, during the course of a routine traffic stop, a police officer’s mere request for identification from a passenger runs afoul of the federal and state constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable seizures. See U.S. Const., amend. IV; Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, § 6. We hold that such a request passes constitutional muster.

BACKGROUND

The salient facts in this case are not in dispute. On December 9, 1998, Officers McCarthy and Lee of the Naperville police department were on routine patrol. Both officers were in plain clothes in an unmarked vehicle. At…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CosbyIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API