Legal Opinion

Home Insurance v. Duke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7331PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellant insured William A. Duke against loss by fire. After a loss had occurred, the policy was assigned, by endorsement, to the appellee, who brought this suit against the appellant upon the policy. A demurrer to the complaint, for want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was overruled and the appellant excepted. An answer was filed in ten paragraphs, of which the first was the general denial. The appellee demurred to each of the other nine paragraphs, for want of facts sufficient to constitute a defence. The demurrers were sustained as to the sixth,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Alford v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Shaw v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Rising Sun Insurance v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. PickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Western Assurance Co. v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Traders Insurance v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ætna Insurance v. KittlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API