Legal Opinion

Traders Insurance v. Newman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1889No. 13,883PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

The appellees were the plaintiffs below, and brought this action on a fire policy issued by the appellant to the appellee, James M. Newman.

The complaint contains four paragraphs, each of which was demurred to separately, the demurrers overruled and exceptions taken.

Several paragraphs of answer were filed, to which, except the general denial, replies were filed, and the cause being at issue was submitted to a jury, who afterwards returned a special verdict. Upon the return of the verdict the appellant moved for judgment thereon, which motion was, by the court, overruled, and an exception taken.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Wright v. Wright's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  3. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Mutual Fire Insurance v. DealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  5. Agricultural Insurance v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Patterson v. Durand Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Planters' Mutual Insurance v. LoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  4. Transportation Equipment Rentals, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kludt v. German Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API