Legal Opinion
Larry v. Yamauchi
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided December 21, 1990No. LR-C-89-831PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
Certain food stamp recipients challenge the Secretary of Agriculture’s policy of counting monetary assistance in the form of utility reimbursements received under the Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1437 et seq., as income for the purposes of calculating food stamp benefits. This case is properly decided on cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 As required by Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.
The plaintiffs represent a class consisting of food stamp recipients subject to hav ing…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Debra Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Baum v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Carpenter v. N.C. Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- West v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.