Legal Opinion
Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 17, 1993No. Civ. 92-67-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
BRODY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Cross-Motions for Judgment on a Stipulated Record. At issue is whether Defendants violated the Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq., by including Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”) utility reimbursements received by Plaintiffs as income when calculating Plaintiffs’ food stamp benefits. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the reimbursements they receive qualify as “energy assistance” and should therefore be excluded from the food stamp…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Debra Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- South Dakota, Department of Social Services v. MadiganDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1993
- Debra Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Estey v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Estey v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.