Legal Opinion

Debra Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 20, 1994No. 93-1453PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on stipulated facts upholding a policy of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) that reduces their food stamp benefits. The district court upheld the USDA policy of counting as income for food stamp purposes the utility reimbursements plaintiffs receive from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and from the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). Estey v. Commissioner, Maine Dep’t of Human Servs., 814 F.Supp. 152 (D.Me.1993). Because we conclude that the energy-related components of HUD and FmHA utility…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. St. Luke's Hospital v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Blackstone Valley Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Strickland v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Good v. Altria Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API