McCoy v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
In this diversity personal injury action, plaintiff moves for production of his statement given to a representative of defendant’s insurance carrier, Rule 34, 28 U.S.C., or, in the alternative, prohibit the defendant from taking plaintiff’s oral deposition which has been noticed. Rule 30(b), 28 U.S.C.
The alleged accident occurred on December 13, 1960. Within a month plaintiff was interviewed by a representative of defendant’s insurance carrier. At argument, defendant exhibited this statement to the court, and its counsel stated that it was in the handwriting of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Brown v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Hayman v. Pullman Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
- The New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Alva O. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Parla v. Matson Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rofail v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Hendrick v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Smith v. Central Linen Service Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Torres-Paulett v. Tradition Mariner, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1994
- Walls v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.