Layton v. Cregan Mallory Co., Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by her by reason of defendant’s negligence. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals and plaintiff takes a cross-appeal.
The case was here in Layton v. Cregan & Mallory Co., 263 Mich. 30, where the facts sufficiently appear; and in Layton v. Cregan & Mallory Co., 265 Mich. 574, where additional facts appear. Sixty errors are assigned by appellant, some of which will be considered, and all disposed of.
1. Many lay witnesses were permitted to testify, over objection on the part of defendant, to the acts, conduct,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Cluett v. RosenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Degroot v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Boydan v. HaberstumpfMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Badalamenti v. William Beaumont Hospital-TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. GLS LeascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Lapasinskas v. QuickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Clark v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.