Legal Opinion

K. D. Oil Co. v. Datel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1930No. 21104PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

This proceeding was instituted in this court to review an award by the State Industrial Commission. The record discloses that the respondent Ed. Datel, while running easing in an oil well, was injured March 7, 1928, by being struck on the arm and left ankle by a falling timber. It was admitted that his injury arose out of and was received in the course of his employment, and compensation was paid from March 19, 1928, to October 22, 1928, at which time it was discontinued. Thereafter the matter whs assigned for hearing on March 26, 1929, to determine the extent of disability. The record does…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Bedford-Carthage Stone Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Sun Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. United States Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Tidal Refining Co. v. TivisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Drilling Co. v. DaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. White Oak Refining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Loffland Bros. Co. v. VelvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API