Legal Opinion

Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1920No. 10494PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal from Order of State Industrial Commission.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This is an appeal by the petitioners, Choctaw Portland Cement Company and Commercial Underwriters Exchange, from an order of the State Industrial Commission in reopening and making a ne\f award to one Short Lamb, who was injured while in the employ of the first-named petitioner. It appears from the record that there have been three awards in this case; the first having been made on October 8, 1917, the second on March 8, 191S, and the one appealed from on January 27,1919.

It is first asserted by petitioners that under section 12, art. 2, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act it is a condition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Shinnick v. Clover Farms Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bristow Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. H. K. Toy & Novelty Co. v. RichardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gange Lumber Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API