Legal Opinion

United States v. Hardeman

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 20, 2004No. 03-0208/AFPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge BAKER

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Pursuant to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a special court-martial, military judge alone, of one specification of unauthorized absence and one specification of failure to go in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 886 (2000). The adjudged sentence provided for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. In accordance with a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved confinement for two months, but otherwise approved the sentence as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. FrancisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillippeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  4. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API