Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hamer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2011No. 09-6481PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Christina Roberts, proceeding solely as the next Mend of her two minor children, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her children’s claims against defendants Christopher and Joan Hamer for violations of the disclosure requirements contained in the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (“RLPHRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4851^856. Because the statute does not provide her children with a cause of action to sue for the violations, we affirm.

I

Christina Roberts is the mother of minors Howard Felix Wipfel and Thealyn Wipfel. In October 2002,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Berry v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API