Legal Opinion

United States v. Dickinson

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 9, 2006No. NMCCA 200200311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GEISER, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial with enlisted representation of willful disobedience of a superior noncommissioned officer, two specifications of failure to obey a lawful *564general regulation, dereliction of duty, negligent damage of Government property, drunken operation of a vehicle, being drunk on duty, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and three specifications of obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 81, 91, 92, 108, 111, 112, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 891, 892, 908, 911, 912, and 934.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  4. United States v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. BevacquaU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HutchinsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API