Legal Opinion
Agfa Corp. v. Creo Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 2006No. 2005-1079PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
*1369RADER, Circuit Judge.
After a bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts declared all of Agfa Corporation’s asserted patents unenforceable for inequitable conduct. Agfa Corp. v. Creo Prods., Inc., Civil Action No. 00-10836-GAO (D.Mass. Oct. 5, 2004) (Judgment) (judgment incorporating the trial court’s earlier Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment dated Aug. 24, 2004 {Decision)). Agfa challenges that result and also appeals the trial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Medtronic Xomed, Inc. v. GYRUS ENT LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Diomed, Inc. v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.