Legal Opinion
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. v. GYRUS ENT LLC
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 1, 2006No. 8:04-cv-00400PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 1
CORRIGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ motions to bifurcate the trial in this patent infringement case involving a method of performing sinus surgery and a sinus de-brider instrument, U.S. Patent No. 6,293,-957 (“'957 Patent”). Each party requests a different configuration of the proceedings. Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate, filed by defendant/counterclaimant Gyrus ENT LLC, (“Gyrus”), requests the Court bifurcate the trial as to liability and damages. (Doc. 194.) Plaintiff/counterdefen-dant Medtronic Xomed, Inc. (“Xomed”) has filed a Motion To Bifurcate The Issue Of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Elk Corporation Of Dallas v. Gaf Building Materials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Abbott Point of Care, Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Gilbert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Buress v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.